Europe's Wake-Up Call
Hats off to William Kristol and Joseph Bottum for their in-depth reviews of President Bush's second inaugural ("On Tyranny" and "Just the Right Amount of God," Jan. 31). Bush delivered a speech that will echo for at least his next term--not just in Washington, but also in Berlin, Paris, and Madrid. He made it clear to European leaders that the best way to ensure our safety is to promote a freer and more democratic world.
Over here in Europe, thanks to the multicultural unrest in some places, that message is just beginning to trickle in.
Maico R. Hoksbergen
Coevorden, Netherlands
Language Barrier
I found some of David Gelernter's criticisms of President Bush's inaugural address to be valid ("Sometimes a Great Speech," Jan. 31). But his valid comments were, for the most part, minor points. (For example: "best defended" is indeed a better phrase than "most defended.")
Overall, Gelernter's "confusion" appears to stem more from his own laziness with words than from a lack of clarity on the part of the president. I took issue with many of Gelernter's criticisms, but will confine my brief response to the three that bugged me most.
First, Gelernter's criticism of "no one deserves to be a slave" seems to be premised upon a misapprehension of what the word "slave" means. Slavery connotes much more than forced labor. It connotes the complete ownership of one by another without any accountability to the rule of law. Slavery is dehumanizing. Saddam Hussein may deserve execution, but does Gelernter really believe that Saddam deserves to be stripped of his humanity--of all right to the protection of law--and be sold as chattel?
Second, "the pretensions of tyrants" is a superior construction to Gelernter's proposed "barbarity of tyrants." Not all tyrants are barbaric. A tyrant is merely a ruler who has seized power without moral right. By definition, all tyrants are pretentious, because their authority is false and unsupportable (i.e., based upon pretense).
Third, the phrase "My most solemn duty is to protect this nation" means exactly what it says. The president's duty in this regard is much more than "important" or "hard." "Solemn" conveys the somberness and gravity of sending troops into battle, as well as the sacredness of the president's sworn responsibilities in this regard. Neither of Gelernter's proposed replacements--"most important" or "hardest"--conveys that at all. Each would be a very weak substitute.
Dan Murdock
Charleston, WV
Condi Rice in 2008?
Duncan Currie's "And They're Off!" (Jan. 31) omits Condoleezza Rice from the ranks of possible Republican presidential candidates for 2008.
Yet Rice may be the only GOP candidate who can beat Hillary Clinton. New York's junior senator has been trying to reposition herself near the political center after realizing the far left is destroying the Democratic party. If she is successful in remaking her image, she may attract enough conservative women to bolster her base and beat any male opponent. Condi is the antidote to Hillary.
Paul Fournier
Pepperell, MA
Erratum
A recent review of Ruth Price's new book on Agnes Smedley ("An American Abroad," Jan. 31) mistakenly identified the "German-born agent of Soviet military intelligence" who recruited Smedley as "Victor Sorge." That agent's first name was actually Richard--Richard Sorge--and he was born in Azerbaijan, not Germany.